
Christians,
fueled by the fear of looking stupid by believing in silly things, often
concoct laughable and faulty theories to prove the existence of their
god. One of the most laughable of these theories points to the form of
the banana. (No, I'm not kidding.) Yes, people. Fruit.
Before I rip the lunacy of this argument to shreds, let's first review the
insanity of it all.
Remember
washed-up actor Kirk Cameron, star of ABC's Growing Pains (1985-1992)? Well,
while ABC couldn't save his terminally bad but strangely successful acting
career, Jesus, apparently, saved Kirk's soul from an eternity in
hell. Anyway, while channel surfing one night, I stumbled upon an
evangelical Christian talk show hosted by none other than Kirk Cameron himself.
How
desperate can a person be to win a soul over for Christ? Well, Kirk and
his evangelical TV side-kick, Ray
Comfort, were pretty damn desperate. Being so deluded
and desperate to see what he wanted to see, Ray sat there, looked straight
into the camera, held up a banana, and with the straightest face imaginable, I
kid you not, made the following utterly ridiculous argument [paraphrased]:
|
The Banana: The Atheist's Nightmare The
banana...
To
say that the banana happened by accident is even more unintelligent than to
say that no one designed the Coca Cola can. |
Note: The actual wording of this argument and the picture
of the banana (above) was taken from an evangelical Christian website, but
Ray's fundamental argument was substantially the same--except for his choice of
words.
Well
now you have it, my friends. Absolute, concrete proof that god
exists! And wouldn't you know it, it just happens to be the Christian
god. Whew. I was getting nervous that the Hindus could be
right. But after thousands of years of debate by the greatest minds in
history, who would have thought the proof of god's existence could be found in
fresh fruit?
It
was quite a spectacle, folks. Ray demonstrated how the two ridges between
the thumb and index finger are identical to (and line up perfectly with) the
ridges on inside edge of a half-peeled banana. How can we possibly deny
the perfect harmony between all things that god created?
Thoroughly
consistent with evangelical Christians seeing only what they want to
see, Ray never mentioned coconuts, watermelons, and pineapples, just to
name a few, and how their apparent "design" [long pause for comic
effect] isn't efficient--just like the banana. In fact, the
"design" of these three fruits is downright awful, awkward, messy,
and wholly inefficient for human consumption. But let's just sweep that
under the rug--just like every other argument that scares the crap out of
evangelicals. LA-LA-LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
All the while Kirk sat there chuckling
as if shocked that seemingly intelligent people could not see
this rather obvious and perfect example of god's design. Aw
hell. I probably shouldn't be that hard on the easily-fooled fellow.
Sure, he's completely delusional--but he did nail Chelsea Nobel.
I suppose I should at least give him credit for that. Besides, nothing
eases profound stupidity faster that a hot piece of Christian ass. Here's
a picture of Kirk showing what must be turned off in order to think like a
Christian.
Okay,
people. It's time to awake from the aforementioned state of mental
inactivity and employ a little common sense, shall we? But first, a
disclaimer...
Those
with delicate sensitivities and an appalling lack of sense of humor are
cautioned NOT to read the rest of this essay. I chose an
admittedly base, sophomoric, and bawdy counter-argument for two reasons.
First, it demonstrates the silliness of the notion that fruit could be used to
prove the existence of a higher power. And second, it's funny as
hell. Okay, now it's time to get down and dirty.
|
The Banana: The Christian's Nightmare We
all know that sex is as pleasurable as it is functional. Our species
wants to live on, and procreation (through the act of sex) accomplishes that
goal. But as we also all know, sex feels good--and we do it more often
for pleasure than for procreation. And while it takes two to tango, it
only takes one to feel good sexually. Of course, it's not nearly as fun
going solo, but it certainly does do the trick. Modern
technology and advances in the manufacture of synthetics and small battery
operated vibrating devices have given women in need of "something
special" all sorts of wonderful sex toys to do the job when no man is
available. Ask any woman over the age of 30 (who isn't shy or a prude)
and you'll hear a testament to the merits of dildos and vibrators. But
the technology that has given women these toys of pleasure has not always
existed. What did women do before the advent of these modern sexual
conveniences? What did Eve, Ruth, Ester, and all their biblical sisters
do back then? God
gave women sex organs through which sexual pleasure may be derived. If
we were designed, as Christians argue, then god certainly wanted women to
have pleasure because he gave them all the parts that provide it. And
as god is all-knowing, he certainly knew long before each one of us were even
born, that there would often be times throughout our lives where those strong
sexual urges would drive us mad because we had no available partner to take
care of business. So
being the all-knowing, all-powerful, kind, and loving god that our designer
and creator is, he gave women the banana. And anyone with only an ounce
of common sense and even the most clouded power of perception can see the
brilliance of god's perfect design of this particular fruit. The
banana...
To say that the banana's perfect design for sexual gratification just happened by accident is even more unintelligent than to say that no one designed the Coca Cola can. |
On a final note, as for the
design of the Coca Cola can, [everyone say it with me...]
"A-DUH!" The Coca Cola can was designed? Really?
Wow! I never knew that. Silly me, I should have known. After
all, the designer and manufacturer's name is printed right on the can! I
don't know how I could have missed that one. I mean, it's so
obvious. There's even an address and phone number right there in plain
sight. Too bad god didn't do the same with bananas. That would make
Ray's silly argument hold at least some
water. But, alas, it will have to remain just that: a silly
argument. Sorry, but neither bananas nor humans bear any label, name,
logo, trademark, or copyright like that silly and weak Coke can analogy.
There's not one shred of proof indicating who or what designed us--if we were
even designed at all. Maybe the Hindu god who created the human race just
forgot to label us. Perhaps it was the alien overlords who brought us
here eons ago who made that particular mistake. Beats me. And it
beats you, too.
Nice try, Ray. Thanks
for playing our game.
Click here to watch the actual
show that featured the aforementioned "nightmare." It's about
28 minutes long and well worth your time. Trust me, you won't believe
this spectacle of delusion. It's a textbook example of how people see
what they want [read: need] so desperately to see. [END]